Oct 262012

Another week of fun and games have passed. Old Susannah was pleased to have attended a few nice dinners, and enjoyed a few nice BrewDogs.

Malone is synonymous with quality, elegance, good taste and beauty.  Jo Malone that is.  A lovely champagne and canapes event was enjoyed by a few dozen people this past Wednesday in their Aberdeen showroom, and I’ve got a few lovely new colognes and candles.

As to the other, slightly less fragrant local Malone, Aileen must be pleased as punch that the ‘Tree for Every Citizen’ scheme has won an award!  More on that later.

I am also very grateful indeed to have now made it to 100 columns.

There never seems to be a shortage of things to write about in our city, shire and country. Just when you think you have seen it all (from seagulls stealing crisps from newsagents to men getting their heads stuck in rubbish bins), something even more preposterous comes along.

The virtues of our former council and its employees, our Independence woad-warrior First Minister, some of our worthy citizens and even Japan have been inspiring me with their virtues of late. Faith, Hope and Charity are considered to be among the most noble of virtues.  Let’s see where they fit in with this week’s developments.

Faith: (noun) An unswerving loyalty to a cause or religion, trust in a person, group or religion, often where there is no hard evidence or logic to support taking such a position.

I guess we all need a little  more faith, particularly in our leaders and those who want our money for charity.

To start with, we should take it on faith that Alex Salmond did/did not take legal advice over the legal aspects of an independent Scotland and the EU.  He definitely did/did not say anything of the kind.  He also did/did not spend taxpayer money trying to thwart a Freedom of Information Request which would have shown he did/did not take legal advice.  Hope that’s cleared things up.

When Japan had a catastrophic tsunami event some while back, like many others, I sent money in good faith, believing that the money was going to be used to help those affected by this natural disaster.  Thankfully, there was so much money left over that the Japanese government was able to take a million or two and put it to the very charitable use of a PR campaign to smear the Sea Shepherd.

Now the Sea Shepherd is an irritating vessel and crew that try to stop scientific progress.  They are interfering with Japan’s scientific reasearch programme on whales and dolphins which involves scientifically harpooning the creatures and eating them, and/or selling them to aquariums, where the lucky dolphins and whales can be scientifically taught how to jump through hoops for food.

We just saw the annual slaughter (a fairly recent event really – don’t believe the hype this goes back hundreds of years – it’s new, hip and trendy) of about 50-60 marine mammals in Japan’s Taji Cove.  Bothersome protestors tried to monitor and deter the event.

Perhaps those who enjoy seeing animals perform in aquariums might like going along to Taji next year?  It is after all what they’re supporting when they pay to go to dolphin and whale shows.

I’m thinking of sending Japan some more money now, to help with the science, you know.  You gotta have Faith.

There is, by the way, a Japan Facebook page, extolling the more pleasant aspects of the country.  Alas, it no longer allows me to make posts.

Some guy named Richard posted a comment on the Japan page to the effect of ‘shut up about the bloody dolphins (I guess they were bloody by then, having just been killed in a tiny cove they had been held captive in for weeks) – posting about stuff on Facebook is stupid and doesn’t do any good.’

Richard of course decided to share his wisdom about the futility of making posts on Facebook by… making a post on Facebook.  I  hear he may look for a job in the BiG Partnership.

Hope: (noun) An absence of despair, a belief that something good will happen.

Hope is likewise a great virtue.  When the old Council had Aileen Malone running the Housing & Environment committee, it was hoped she’d do a great job.  Result.  She, Ranger Ian Tallboys and Pete Leonard very much hoped that no one would realise there was a deer cull attached to their excellent ‘tree for every citizen scheme’ when the consultation to the public was open; they also hoped no one would notice they didn’t mention the cull at the time.

They definitely hoped private companies would come forward with money, but strangely enough, no one wanted their brand linked to slaughtered deer.

One of their hopes has come true:  Princess Anne is shown in a lovely photo this week in the local news, giving Ian Tallboys… a certificate!  I always thought he was certifiable.  Can honours in the New Year be far away for Talltales, HoMalone and Pete?  I know I hope so.

However, I hope no one will be writing to the Princess’ secretary, giving full details of this amazing scheme, such as the 2,500 people who signed a petition against the cull, the scheme’s financial accounts, the fact the city let Chris Piper write a report which in effect recommended giving him loads of dosh for killing our deer, and the fact that a few thousand less trees than promised were planted on Tullos.

It should be noted that the ‘tree for every citizen’ scheme is nearly as scientific as Japan’s whaling programme.  It started with a LibDem election pledge which was a soundbite (A tree for every citizen! Genius!) Then, per one of Tallboy’s scientific powerpoint reports, one of the challenges was…. to figure out where to put all these trees.

Soundbite first, reality second.  Did it matter we lost a meadow and a herd of nearly tame, dearly-loved deer?  Not in the least.

I hope no one will be sending the latest photos which prove the exposed ground is basically a pile of rocks with lots of trash mixed through it, and the place is now an absolute shambles.

Here’s hoping nothing will spoil this great triumphant moment of success.

As Ian Tallboys put it:

“It is great news that the hard work of everyone involved is now being recognised on the national stage.” 

As I am fond of saying:  Result!  I will do all I can to ensure they get the recognition they deserve.

Charity: (noun) the act of giving assistance, whether financial or practical, to those in need.

The Aberdeen Cyrenians, a charity for the homeless was just one of many local charities to have its budgets slashed by the Kate Dean adminstration back in the good old days.  Rather than working to collect some £11 million of bad debt, and manage things wisely, we cut down on wasteful charities.  Quite right too.

Thankfully we have since been more selective in what charities we give money to – or at least the previous administration did.  I can announce for those of you who didn’t know that Aberdeen City generously gave £22,245.00 to a great cause in November 2011.  This amount was for an ‘Enterpreneur / Enterprise Education Pilot’.

Was the  money requested by some grass roots group with little resources?  Perhaps by a local charity with no means of its own?  Was it a group that needed money for this pilot more than the other charities which had funding slashed recently?

Indeed.  Yes, this money was paid by the taxpayer to The Wood Family Trust.  You know, the people who brought you – well, nearly brought you – the Granite Web.

You might be wondering what kind of a charity the Trust is.  So am I.  As we know, billionaire Sir Ian promised to give £50 million in aid to Africa if we didn’t want  the web.  I am sure Africa will be getting this much needed aid any second.  When the Wood Family Trust shortly reveals its next audited accounts as charities must, I’m sure all will be clear.

They seem to do a great deal of work in Rwanda, and have  partnership of some sort with the Sainsbury organisation to do so.  Now you may have read of Rwanda’s AIDS epidemic and the problems of AIDS being passed to children.

( Click On The Picture to Enlarge. ) 

Perhaps you think of its early mortality rates, and the genocide which plagued the land, and the povery that most people live in.  The Wood Family Trust is going to change all of that – by improving how Rwanda landowners grow and market tea.

There is an old saying, ‘give a man a fish and he eats for a day; teach him to fish, and he’ll never go hungry.’  I think this needs an update, and I might suggest: ‘give a man a better way to grow tea on his land, and the wealth will trickle down to the neediest members of that society – or not.’

Charities get all sorts of amazing tax breaks; some of the more cynical among us might ask questions of some charities.  What do they actually do?  Who or what problem are they helping?  Do they have  many people on board who earn over £50k per year?

If they have millions of pounds, how much is actually going on direct charitable work for others?  Are they asking for taxpayer money which then means other charities, schools, the elderly or people with special needs must go without?  Good thing we’re not cynical and have faith in charities.

Are all charities not for profit?  Not exactly.  For instance there is a charitable trust based in the tax haven of Lichtenstein run by a banking group.  A nice little wheeze was recently exposed when an accountant was jailed for a £5 million pound tax evasion scam – which he’d apparently skimmed off those clients he was helping.

Basically, a few worthless shares were artifically pumped up and over valued.  These shares were sold to charities, and donated / moved on.  In a complex scheme, the ‘charities’ were able to claim the price difference back and got gift aid as well, while getting tax relief.  Maybe we should all go into the charity business.

Next week:  more little gems I uncovered while looking through last year’s invoices – including some Milne invoices, and a BiG surprise.  Cheerio!

  • Comments enabled – see comments box below. Note, all comments will be moderated.

  17 Responses to “Old Susannah No. 100: Faith, Hope & Charity”

  1. Congratulations Old Susannah on reaching a hundred!!

  2. Change the record; wood, trump, ,milne, repeat……………

    What have you ever done to bring employment to the area? why attack the people that do?

    That’s the problem with socialists, they point out problems and are snide to people they see as being rich but they never come up with any solutions.

    And if Japanese people want to eat whales who are we to stop them, we eat plenty of fish and meat!

    • Ah George Smith… Old Halliburton Man himself. I remember you said to me in one conversation that you LOVE Donald Trump. That just about says it all, really…

    • George – ‘A healthy male adult bore consumes each year one and a half times his own weight on other people’s patience.’ ……..Updike.

    • I don’t understand George… you complain about the content of these articles, yet you still read them (pretty much as soon as they are published, as far as i can make out) and respond just to argue for arguments sake. It seems to me that you are in fact the one with the vendetta.

      Also, comparing the butchering and decimation of the whale population to the captive farming of livestock is ludicrous… whales are an extremely intelligent species of mammal whose numbers are in rapid decline as a result of the massacres that take place. To disregard the value of the existence of these creatures and to excuse the likely extermination of their species shows ignorance and a distinct lack of compassion

  3. I’m sorry but what was started as a paper for the people of Aberdeen has turned into a left wing propaganda rag, every week is full of attacks on the same people. Aberdeen has a lot going for it so why not concentrate on that instead of the constant campaigning against the same people/projects.

    I mean hating Mr Wood for his support of the cgp is fair enough but to then keep picking at him by questioning his charity work is just being too personal and borders on stalking. The same goes for Mr Trump, you don’t like him, we get it! plenty of people in Aberdeen do though and many welcome his investment. The objectivity on here has been lost due to the blind hatred of these people.

    And bringing my place of work into a debate isn’t very nice, all I’m doing is airing my opinion.

    • If you have a look at the FAQ page (see top right) you will see that anyone can submit an article which will be published if it is of sufficient quality and credibility, is relevant and/or of general interest to people in Aberdeen and the Northeast of Scotland and is not distasteful, offensive, or libellous.

      There is, therefore, nothing to stop you submitting an article which represents your views as long as it meets these criteria.

  4. George, Just a few words from one Smith to another. Aberdeen Voice gives a voice as did Anthony Baxters film to those who are largely ignored by our local press Having worked at one time in the newspaper industry for 23 years, our illustrious local press have always been on the side of big business as that is where their advertising revenue comes from, however that does not necessarily make them right wing.
    Similarily if the AV puts the rich under intense scrutiny it does not mean they are necessarily left wing.
    It’s all a matter of how you view the world. As long as the media reflects the truth then thats fine by me.

  5. H Harper,

    I have no desire to write an article, I’m no journalist! I do however care about Aberdeen and its people and I can see no reason why some of the resident writers here have to deride some of the wealthier business leaders we have amongst us. A quick google got me the links below, it quickly becomes apparent that the Wood family trust are doing a huge amount of charity work at home as well as Africa, instead of being snide about Mr Woods efforts why not applaud him for being generous, he could quite easily sit on his wealth and do nothing. The tea efforts in Africa are surely a better way of providing long term help to the Country instead of simply giving them money or aid, it looks a great idea! i simply don’t see what good it does attacking the man because he had a different vision for the city centre than the article writer.








  6. May I just add that I don’t mind in the slightest any of my council tax money going to the linked project, it sounds a great initiative, infact it’s projects like these I’d be interested in reading about, our young people being encouraged to open up and run a business through a school project sounds great, I wish my daughters school was involved. The long term benefits of this training to the entire area also shouldn’t be ignored as these kids take the experience into the real World, well done our council and the Wood family trust for providing funding.


  7. George min, Voice was originally set up in early summer 2010 due to the frustration many people felt at the lack of objectivity in the local press over proposed developments such as (and especially) UTG.

    As someone who’s been in since the start, albeit deliberately in mostly a backroom capacity, the ethos has always been to give a platform to members of the public who have something to articulate. If you don’t want to take up that offer, that’s your choice, but we HAVE given space to contributions which take the same view as you express in your feedback to us.

    We operate on a wholly voluntary basis. It takes up time that few of us have to spare. We don’t have the backing of a large organisation, we don’t take ads and are not in the pockets of any commercial or political body or individual.

    Given that your views seem adequately and widely expressed by the local print media, I think you’re doing OK publicity-wise for the views you express withput haranguing Aberdeen Voice.

    As someone else said, feel free to submit something for publication, otherwise you’re missing the point (some might think delibetayely) of what Voice was established to do.

  8. George, no one denies that Sir Ian’s trust does good work, in many nations, including our own. What is being complained about is the fact that he and much more prominently, Trump, are trying to bulldoze through projects which have modest support, by nothing short of bully boy tactics. The assertions for both the City Garden and Menie projects were, to say the least,.somewhat over-stated. No one likes a bully. That is the hub of the matter.

  9. Ron,

    That’s not what the article above is saying, it’s looking for another avenue to attack Mr Wood, the author can’t wait for the trust to file accounts so she can pour over them looking for holes. As I said fair enough to oppose the CGP even though it got a majority in the referendum but please don’t use that as an excuse to hound a man who has done so much for the City and with his charity work. I’m proud we have a charity based in Aberdeen that’s attempting to help those less fortunate than us in Africa and at home.

  10. Fair enough George, but please don’t go on about the much vaunted “referendum.” That was so heavily biased that it reflected something one would expect in a banana republic. The desired outcome was achieved by blatant lies, half truths and extremely misleading artists impressions. You seem to forget that previous consultations threw out the project and the one purporting to give the public a choice of plans was a farce, in that the public choice was disregarded and the results hidden for a considerable time. All in all, the proponents of The City Garden should hang their heads in shame at such a deliberate ploy to mislead the citizens, yourself included.

  11. Ron,

    Shame on you for doubting the intelligence and ability of your fellow citizens to decide what they wanted and to weigh up both sides of the debate, strange why these accusations of bias only flew when your side lost the referendum. That debate has been done to death so lets not go over it again.

  12. George: I’m talking facts. Are you trying to tell me, or anyone else, that the representations of both sides in the referendum were equal (normally a requirement)?

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>