Jun 282012

Following the release of the City Garden project business case on Thursday afternoon, youth councillor Kenneth Watt comments on the financial plan.

“The report highlights initial concerns with the City Garden Project. All risks featured in the business case are of high or medium risk.
Most concerning is the risk of running out of private sector donations, which is the most severe risk in the report, at 75%. Aberdeen City Council are expected to gamble over half of the funding through the risky TIF scheme. 

“There’s no substantial back-up plan for failure to capture private investment.”

“Even if capital costs increase by just 10%, the loan won’t be repayable in 25 years and the council will have to increase its borrowing to over £100m. A leading economist said last year that capital projects such as these could easily cost double.
( Ref:
 Neil Baxter, Press and Journal 14/5/2010 )

“This project could really drive the city in to more debt which is not what my generation needs.”

“I’m worried about the long-term impact the project could have on the city. There has been no investigation in to the effect of building another theatre on our existing arts venues. I fail to see real evidence on how over 8000 jobs are going to be created by replacing a park with a park, adding an extra floor to the Art Gallery and improving pedestrian routes in the city centre.”

“The risk is just too high and I remain unconvinced by the business case. People inAberdeenvalue public services and are already feeling the effect of £618m of debt. They don’t need more worry caused by short-sighted economic plans centred around a park pushed only by the city’s out-of-touch wealthy elite.”

  • Comments enabled – see comments box below. Note, all comments will be moderated.

  2 Responses to “Reaction To City Garden Project Business Case”

  1. Still £15m short on donations from the private business sector gagging for this to go ahead, we were told. One imagines that being the reticent, shy, self-effacing, publicity-averse philanthropists they are, content to take a back seat when publicity is offered, that they have already pledged the money and have just ticked the “no publicity” box.

    The rich man in his castle,
    The poor man at his gate,
    He made them, high or lowly,
    And ordered their estate.

    And don’t you forget it, peasant.

  2. The figure of 8000 jobs is pure hopeful speculation and utterly baseless. The dependence on TIF is fraught with all sorts of difficulties, so many unknowns and what happens if businesses fail to produce the cash required? The council will be responsible which will mean cutting services to cover any (inevitable) shortfall.
    Complete madness when all that is required is some intelligent updating of UTG.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>