Voice’s Old Susannah looks at events over the the last week … and what a week it’s been in the ‘Deen. By Suzanne Kelly.
‘SHATTERED!’ roars the Press & Journal headline following the council’s decision on Wednesday not to pursue a £92 million pound loan to build the Granite Web. There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth; most of the wailing stemming from Jennifer Craw’s insistence on putting her feet on the back of the seat in front of her as she sat in the public gallery.
What was agreed was the madcap idea of trying to fix the Gardens and our existing facilities. Surely if that sort of thing worked, people would already be doing it. No, a Granite Web was the only thing that was going to save our town’s economy.
We are apparently doomed to being a ghost town. Unfortunately no one’s told this to the many companies moving into the area. Shame.
Without further ado, here are some definitions relevant to this week’s news stories…
Online Bullying: (mod. Eng. noun) the use of electronic media to harass, intimidate or ridicule.
Those on the losing side are quite rightly using Facebook and email to hound, vilify and harass those who voted for the modest independent compromise motion. There has been a Facebook page set up calling Barney Crocket ‘The man who killed democracy’.
Absolutely. He got elected, did what he said he and his party were going to do, and reminded everyone why the referendum was a sham won by a slim margin in favour of those who saturated the public with lovely brochures and endless radio ads.
The content of these ads promised the earth, billions of pounds of income, and 6,500 new jobs. Sadly, some people remained a little sceptical that these were achievable, even though the P&J said they were.
The official campaign organisations didn’t spend as much so they couldn’t win; just because the guidelines told them what their limits were for spending and ad content, there was no reason they couldn’t compete fairly with the wishes of a billionaire and a multimillionaire.
But back to this Facebook page. All those people are queuing up to smear Crockett and his like-minded councillors; well, fair enough.
It was almost as if he were trying to lump all the opposition together and tar them with a very sinister brush.
Obviously the page in question is not in any way connected to the BiG partnership or any of its student interns, Jake the Ghost, or Morris the Monkey – for that would be playing fast and loose with Facebook and PR professional association rules. And that just wouldn’t happen – except for the time that it did, of course, during the referendum.
The important thing for us Aberdonians to remember about online bullying is when it is or is not a good thing. It is perfectly acceptable to use social media and emails to hound people like Crockett and Boulton, who clearly don’t care that businesses are departing Aberdeen in droves and the four horsemen of the apocalypse have been seen near Tillydrone.
But when someone rich and important like Tom Smith is subject to online bullying, then it is a matter for the police. Unfortunately when Tom went to the press, something he now says he didn’t want to do, he mixed online bullying together with people having online conversations which didn’t involve him, as well as with the very illegal crime of computer hacking, which carries a potential jail sentence.
As we since learnt, there was no crime committed, even though he told us there was in a Press & Journal front page article days before the referendum. It was almost as if he were trying to lump all the opposition together and tar them with a very sinister brush.
How exactly this timid soul was forced to go public with his story remains a mystery. Was he bullied into it? Anyone with knowledge of the media handling would be welcome to explain it to me. But as it stands, it seems like Tom was rather left with his foot in his mouth, or something like that.
Olive Branch: (Eng. noun) an offering of peace or conciliation, usually offered after an argument or an altercation.
I’m afraid that a Mr K Flavill has much to answer for. He had the bad humour not to accept the olive branch which was kindly offered to him by the City Gardens Trust supporters, post-referendum. The headline ‘Olive Branch brushed aside’ painted this villainous arts sector worker in his true colours.
However, as the definition of ‘online bullying’ above clearly proves, there are circumstances in which something can either be desirable or not.
Since the City Council has agreed on a measure which will save the Gardens, improve the Gardens, save the businesses on the back of Belmont Street, improve the Lemon Tree and other features of the city’s cultural portfolio, an olive branch is clearly inappropriate.
I do hope no one will suggest that the Granite Web’s supporters should accept an olive branch and work to improve what needs improving, if that is possible without a Web and a £92,000,000 debt. An olive branch in such circumstances can’t be an option.
Sensory Soundscape: (noun, very very modern English) {NOTE: definition known only to Prof. Paul Harris of Gray’s School of Art}
Well, along with not getting our bosque, we will not be getting the ‘Sensory Soundscape’ that Prof. Harris spoke of lovingly in his address, as he put in his deposition in favour of the Web.
He was involved for 18 months with the project as well as the ‘cultural working group’. He spoke to us all about the Web giving us an ‘all-embracing sensory experience’, as well as ‘seamless connectivity’ to boot. And we don’t get to have our ‘sound trails’ either. Obviously you can’t have ‘sound trails’ without a ‘sensory soundscape’.
Old Susannah is now done with her excellent diet, although I could really shed another pound or two, but thank you to all at Temple Aesthetics.
Why am I telling you this? Because as soon as I can get out from under my mounds of UTG-related research papers, I will be heading for my own personal sensory soundscape and sound trails: YES – I am heading back to BrewDog Aberdeen just as soon as I can manage.
Soundgarden will probably be providing the sensory soundscape as I get a pint of either ‘Dead Pony Club’ or ‘Hello my name is Ingrid’, God willing. You want an all-embracing sensory experience? Brewdog will fix you up on that score AND still give you change from £140 million.
Irony: (Eng. noun). A concept of humour which Americans cannot understand.
Sadly, being American-born I have little sense of irony, and arguably even less sense of satire. However, friends suggest two examples to try and help me.
The first concerns a writer called ‘O Henry’. One of his short stories involved a poor newlywed couple trying to get gifts for each other for Christmas. The wife sells her hair to buy a pocket-watch chain for her husband. Meanwhile, he has sold his watch to get her a set of beautiful hairbrushes.
The second example I am given comes from our very own HoMalone. When the deer cull was first suggested as the only possible way in which the non-existent, arbitrary trees were going to thrive on wind-and arson-swept Tullos Hill, Malone wisely turned cold-hearted ( uncharacteristically of course) and refused to listen to the thousands of petition-signers and the three community councils that told her in no uncertain terms not to kill the deer.
She also prevented myself and Andy Findlayson (now a Councillor) from speaking about the deer to the Housing & Environment Committee which she chaired. Her reason for not listening to the people was on the important point (or some say technicality) that she had a verbal report on the deer at the meeting, and not a written one.
Yesterday as I sat in the gallery, I listened to Aileen Malone say how important it was to listen to the people and to give them what they wanted.
Perhaps I will eventually learn the definition of irony. Maybe Councillor Findlayson will have some thoughts on the subject too.
Fudge: 1. (noun Eng.) a delicious, sweet, rich concoction. 2. (verb, Mod Eng) to try and obscure the truth, evade, or move the goalposts in some way.
Senior Statesman Callum McCaig accused the Motion to forget TIF, and just fix what we have with far less borrowing, of being a fudge. Surely nothing would ever be ‘fudged’ by the Web devotees?
Aside from changing their minds and not letting the public say no to the whole scheme when the consultation was live, and aside from disregarding the public choice of garden design, I’m sure that’s true.
There was also the little matter of hiding the actual companies who received tens of thousands of pounds from PR and advertising work on the Web by billing the City via the Chamber of Commerce. No fudge here.
Except for blanking out details from the Garden Project committees’ meetings, apart from hiding the identities of those who spent a fortune on the secretive, unofficial pro-Web campaign – some of whom stood to gain if the thing went through – no fudge going on at all.
Final word of thanks.
None of these long months of fighting to keep our only green city centre space would have been possible but for this one man. This man’s actions brought us 18 months of bitter conflict, and he deserves all of our thanks. Thank you indeed former Provost Peter Stephen.
If you hadn’t used your tie-breaking vote to go against the tradition of keeping to the status quo in tie breaks, we would not have spent hundreds of thousands of pounds of public money pounds on committees, PR, advertising, design shows, ‘stakeholder events’ and so on.
When people today complain that democracy has been killed, it’s good that your conscience is clear. You may or may not have taken a late-night visit from a few rich people before the original vote, but hey, I’m sure you would have been as open to any of us paying you an evening call to discuss the city’s future, too.
Next week: An Old Susannah column with improved connectivity, forward-looking and dynamic, wholly democratic and transparent, offering value for money and stakeholder engagement, complete with a total sensory soundtrail experience. Or maybe just a few more definitions.
- Comments enabled – see comments box below. Note, all comments will be moderated.
Another great one, Suzanne! Just one quibble – our former Provost was Peter Stephen, not John Stephen.
Well spotted Alex …. now corrected.
Excellent article Suzanne, reading AV is my favourite thing to do on a Friday.
You mean to say that some people complain that Democracy has been killed?
Surely Democracy was “hung” when the result of the first consultation was ignored… The body was then “drawn” when the CGT ignored the public’s “best-worst-choice” of the winter garden, in favour of the concrete, sorry, granite web, and it was finally “quartered” when the referendum expenses were “capped”, except for an unofficial group which spent a fortune on glossy brochures with fuzzy pictures and specious financial arguments…
It seems to me that this week’s result was the resurrection of democracy, not it’s death!
Couldn’t agree more Charles!
Charles,
Just keep repeating those things many times a day and you and others will really start to believe there was nothing wrong in ignoring the referendum, sorry “non binding referendum” as the anti people now call it, we all know the truth of course but you and others just keep brainwashing yourselves.
It’s almost as if some anti people are now feeling guilty about ignoring democracy.
If Mike Shepherd and Suzanne and co had refused to be at the referendum vote because they believed it to be biased then their claims now would stack up much better, as it was they virtually drooled over the count and only spat the dummy when the result came out on the wrong side for them.